[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0BD16FCE-26B7-465B-8916-49D1F1EF7B21@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 08:19:52 -0400
From: Jonathan Velez <jonvelez12345@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: usb: dwc3: add documentation of 'sg' field in
dwc3_request struct
> On May 18, 2025, at 8:11 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 08:08:46AM -0400, Jonathan Velez wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On May 18, 2025, at 7:58 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 11:33:30AM +0000, Jonathan Velez wrote:
>>>> core: Add documentation of "sg" field in the dwc3_request struct.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Velez <jonvelez12345@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>>> index f11570c8ffd0..bb140dde07d6 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>>> @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ struct dwc3_hwparams {
>>>> * @request: struct usb_request to be transferred
>>>> * @list: a list_head used for request queueing
>>>> * @dep: struct dwc3_ep owning this request
>>>> + * @sg: pointer to the scatter-gather list for transfers
>>>> * @start_sg: pointer to the sg which should be queued next
>>>> * @num_pending_sgs: counter to pending sgs
>>>> * @remaining: amount of data remaining
>>>
>>> What commit id does this fix?
>> I pulled the mainline and worked on the “for-next” branch. Is that the correct process? Should I be using the “master” branch instead?
>>>
>>> And are you sure you made this against the right tree? I do not see
>>> "sg" as a member of this stucture at all anymore.
>> This was the last commit on the “for-next” branch:
>>
>> commit ffd294d346d185b70e28b1a28abe367bbfe53c04
>
> That is the 6.13 release from way back on January 19. I think a few
> other things have happened since then :)
:)
>
> Please work against either the development branch of the subsystem you
> are submitting changes for, OR against the linux-next tree which merges
> all subsystems together, so that you do not accidentally use an old
> tree.
Moving forward I’ll make sure to work against a subsystem development branch or the linux-next tree, thank you for the help Greg!
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists