lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0BD16FCE-26B7-465B-8916-49D1F1EF7B21@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2025 08:19:52 -0400
From: Jonathan Velez <jonvelez12345@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: usb: dwc3: add documentation of 'sg' field in
 dwc3_request struct



> On May 18, 2025, at 8:11 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 08:08:46AM -0400, Jonathan Velez wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 18, 2025, at 7:58 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 11:33:30AM +0000, Jonathan Velez wrote:
>>>> core: Add documentation of "sg" field in the dwc3_request struct.
>>>> 
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Velez <jonvelez12345@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>>> index f11570c8ffd0..bb140dde07d6 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>>> @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ struct dwc3_hwparams {
>>>> * @request: struct usb_request to be transferred
>>>> * @list: a list_head used for request queueing
>>>> * @dep: struct dwc3_ep owning this request
>>>> + * @sg: pointer to the scatter-gather list for transfers
>>>> * @start_sg: pointer to the sg which should be queued next
>>>> * @num_pending_sgs: counter to pending sgs
>>>> * @remaining: amount of data remaining
>>> 
>>> What commit id does this fix?
>>   I pulled the mainline and worked on the “for-next” branch. Is that the correct process? Should I be using the “master” branch instead?
>>> 
>>> And are you sure you made this against the right tree?  I do not see
>>> "sg" as a member of this stucture at all anymore.
>>   This was the last commit on the “for-next” branch:
>> 
>>   commit ffd294d346d185b70e28b1a28abe367bbfe53c04 
> 
> That is the 6.13 release from way back on January 19.  I think a few
> other things have happened since then :)
   :)
> 
> Please work against either the development branch of the subsystem you
> are submitting changes for, OR against the linux-next tree which merges
> all subsystems together, so that you do not accidentally use an old
> tree.
   Moving forward I’ll make sure to work against a subsystem development branch or the linux-next tree, thank you for the help Greg!
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ