[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <pbg537yuu3sy2ueho5gcfu6cuvgmkobzgvtfemghvp5w6errtv@f4gbobbeqosk>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 18:07:59 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@...cinc.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krishna Manikandan <quic_mkrishn@...cinc.com>,
Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@...cinc.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/24] drm/msm: Add support for SM8750
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:52:15PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/05/2025 02:08, Jessica Zhang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/30/2025 6:00 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Dependency / Rabased on top of
> >> ==============================
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241214-dpu-drop-features-v1-0-988f0662cb7e@linaro.org/
> >
> > Hey Krzysztof,
> >
> > JFYI, I think there was some discussion on IRC (specifically #linux-msm)
> > about having the feature bit dependency back in February.
> >
> > I believe both Abhinav and Dmitry agreed that you can keep the changes
> > to do version checks and drop this dependency.
> >
> > There are still some ongoing discussions regarding the feature bit
> > series, so this way your series isn't blocked by that.
>
> I was asked by Dmitry to rebase this on his rework. That was quite an
> effort. Now I hear the dependency - Dmitry's rework - won't come in and
> I need to rebase back, which will be more effort. Can you all ack this
> so I won't be needing third rebase?
Please wait with the rebase. I still plan to get it in, it is an ongoing
topic. Anyway, I think there are several open issues even with the
current version.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists