[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCthtDxm25RU_fd3@pie.lan>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 16:52:04 +0000
From: Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>
To: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] pmdomain: rockchip: Add support for RK3528
On Sun, May 18, 2025 at 10:06:49PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
> Add configuration and power domains for RK3528 SoC.
>
> Only PD_GPU can fully be powered down. PD_RKVDEC, PD_RKVENC, PD_VO and
> PD_VPU are used by miscellaneous devices in RK3528.
Thanks for your work!
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
> ---
> drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> index 4cce407bb1eb..242570c505fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/rockchip/pm-domains.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include <dt-bindings/power/rk3366-power.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/power/rk3368-power.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/power/rockchip,rk3528-power.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/power/rockchip,rk3562-power.h>
But I had some trouble applying this patch on either Rockchip SoC tree
or linux-pm. Looking through the context, seems the patch depends on
some RK3562 PMU driver changes, which I couldn't find with some brief
searching among the list.
Which branch is the series based on?
> #include <dt-bindings/power/rk3568-power.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/power/rockchip,rk3576-power.h>
> @@ -216,6 +217,9 @@ struct rockchip_pmu {
> #define DOMAIN_RK3399(name, pwr, status, req, wakeup) \
> DOMAIN(name, pwr, status, req, req, req, wakeup)
>
> +#define DOMAIN_RK3528(name, pwr, req) \
> + DOMAIN_M(name, pwr, pwr, req, req, req, false)
> +
> #define DOMAIN_RK3562(name, pwr, req, g_mask, mem, wakeup) \
> DOMAIN_M_G_SD(name, pwr, pwr, req, req, req, g_mask, mem, wakeup, false)
>
> @@ -1215,6 +1219,14 @@ static const struct rockchip_domain_info rk3399_pm_domains[] = {
> [RK3399_PD_SDIOAUDIO] = DOMAIN_RK3399("sdioaudio", BIT(31), BIT(31), BIT(29), true),
> };
>
> +static const struct rockchip_domain_info rk3528_pm_domains[] = {
> + [RK3528_PD_GPU] = DOMAIN_RK3528("gpu", BIT(0), BIT(4)),
> + [RK3528_PD_RKVDEC] = DOMAIN_RK3528("vdec", 0, BIT(5)),
> + [RK3528_PD_RKVENC] = DOMAIN_RK3528("venc", 0, BIT(6)),
> + [RK3528_PD_VO] = DOMAIN_RK3528("vo", 0, BIT(7)),
> + [RK3528_PD_VPU] = DOMAIN_RK3528("vpu", 0, BIT(8)),
> +};
> +
> static const struct rockchip_domain_info rk3562_pm_domains[] = {
> /* name pwr req g_mask mem wakeup */
> [RK3562_PD_GPU] = DOMAIN_RK3562("gpu", BIT(0), BIT(1), BIT(1), 0, false),
> @@ -1428,6 +1440,17 @@ static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3399_pmu = {
> .domain_info = rk3399_pm_domains,
> };
>
> +static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3528_pmu = {
> + .pwr_offset = 0x1210,
> + .status_offset = 0x1230,
> + .req_offset = 0x1110,
> + .idle_offset = 0x1128,
> + .ack_offset = 0x1120,
> +
> + .num_domains = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3528_pm_domains),
> + .domain_info = rk3528_pm_domains,
> +};
> +
> static const struct rockchip_pmu_info rk3562_pmu = {
> .pwr_offset = 0x210,
> .status_offset = 0x230,
> @@ -1538,6 +1561,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id rockchip_pm_domain_dt_match[] = {
> .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-power-controller",
> .data = (void *)&rk3399_pmu,
> },
> + {
> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3528-power-controller",
> + .data = (void *)&rk3528_pmu,
> + },
> {
> .compatible = "rockchip,rk3562-power-controller",
> .data = (void *)&rk3562_pmu,
> --
> 2.49.0
>
Thanks for your effort,
Yao Zi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists