[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf3fffda-8d88-b962-398d-d038cd10b981@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 10:54:48 +0530
From: Souradeep Chowdhury <quic_schowdhu@...cinc.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] remoteproc: Add device awake calls in rproc boot and
shutdown path
Gentle Reminder
On 5/14/2025 1:03 PM, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote:
> Gentle Reminder
>
>
> On 4/8/2025 4:13 PM, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote:
>> Add device awake calls in case of rproc boot and rproc shutdown path.
>> Currently, device awake call is only present in the recovery path
>> of remoteproc. If an user stops and starts rproc by using the sysfs
>> interface, then on pm suspension the firmware fails to load as the
>> request_firmware call under adsp_load relies on usermodehelper
>> process which gets freezed on pm suspension. Add device awake calls
>> to fix this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chowdhury <quic_schowdhu@...cinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mukesh Ojha <mukesh.ojha@....qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v5
>>
>> *Added more details to commit description
>>
>> Changes in v4
>>
>> *Remove stability from mailing list
>> *Remove the extra tab in v3
>> *Change the commit description
>>
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> index c2cf0d277729..5d6c4e694b4c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
>> @@ -1917,6 +1917,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> + pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
>> dev = &rproc->dev;
>> ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
>> @@ -1961,6 +1962,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
>> atomic_dec(&rproc->power);
>> unlock_mutex:
>> mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
>> + pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_boot);
>> @@ -1991,6 +1993,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>> struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
>> int ret = 0;
>> + pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
>> ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
>> @@ -2027,6 +2030,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
>> rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
>> out:
>> mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
>> + pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists