[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a6cbe7b-814b-407c-ac1c-96ab7b787d88@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 12:33:03 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: corbet@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge all the trees
On 5/14/25 7:33 PM, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> [+CC linux-doc]
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 8 May 2025 14:39:11 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Em Thu, 8 May 2025 22:25:31 +1000
>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> escreveu:
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> So, I used "KERNELDOC=$(pwd)/scripts/kernel-doc.pl" and tried again.
>>>
>>> I got these (new) messages:
>>>
>>> Error: Cannot open file drivers/virt/coco/tsm-mr.c
>>> Error: Cannot open file drivers/virt/coco/tsm-mr.c
>>> WARNING: kernel-doc 'scripts/kernel-doc.pl -rst -enable-lineno -export drivers/virt/coco/tsm-mr.c' failed with return code 2
>>>
>>> (and a few other innocuous ones)
>>>
>>> So your guess is good.
>>>
>>> It would be nice to have the Python kernel-doc fixed as well as the
>>> devsec-tsm tree.
>>
>> With regards to kernel-doc, failing to build if a file is missing
>> is the right thing to do.
>
> Mauro, I don't agree here.
>
> With the perl version of kernel-doc, a typo in a file path doesn't cause
> a fatal error of docs build.
>
> kernel-doc as python class libs ends up in a fatal error.
>
> Here is a log of such a fatal error (on top of current docs-next with
> intentional typo made in a pathname in one of .. kernel-doc::
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Sphinx parallel build error!
>
> Versions
> ========
>
> * Platform: linux; (Linux-6.8.0-59-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.39)
> * Python version: 3.12.3 (CPython)
> * Sphinx version: 8.2.3
> * Docutils version: 0.21.2
> * Jinja2 version: 3.1.6
> * Pygments version: 2.19.1
>
> Last Messages
> =============
>
> userspace-api/gpio/gpio-get-chipinfo-ioctl .. userspace-api/media/dvb/dmx-fclose
>
>
> reading sources... [ 90%]
> userspace-api/media/dvb/dmx-fopen .. userspace-api/media/mediactl/media-controller-model
>
>
> reading sources... [ 92%]
> userspace-api/media/mediactl/media-func-close .. userspace-api/media/v4l/diff-v4l
>
> Loaded Extensions
> =================
>
> * sphinx.ext.mathjax (8.2.3)
> * alabaster (1.0.0)
> * sphinxcontrib.applehelp (2.0.0)
> * sphinxcontrib.devhelp (2.0.0)
> * sphinxcontrib.htmlhelp (2.1.0)
> * sphinxcontrib.serializinghtml (2.0.0)
> * sphinxcontrib.qthelp (2.0.0)
> * kerneldoc (1.0)
> * rstFlatTable (1.0)
> * kernel_include (1.0)
> * kfigure (1.0.0)
> * sphinx.ext.ifconfig (8.2.3)
> * automarkup (unknown version)
> * maintainers_include (1.0)
> * sphinx.ext.autosectionlabel (8.2.3)
> * kernel_abi (1.0)
> * kernel_feat (1.0)
> * translations (unknown version)
> * sphinx.ext.imgmath (8.2.3)
>
> Traceback
> =========
>
> File "/<...>/sphinx-8.2.3/lib/python3.12/site-packages/sphinx/util/parallel.py", line 137, in _join_one
> raise SphinxParallelError(*result)
> sphinx.errors.SphinxParallelError: KeyError: '/<...>/lib/bitmap-bad.c'
>
>
> The full traceback has been saved in:
> /tmp/sphinx-err-8jzxndsr.log
>
> To report this error to the developers, please open an issue at <https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/>. Thanks!
> Please also report this if it was a user error, so that a better error message can be provided next time.
> make[3]: *** [/<...>/Documentation/Makefile:123: htmldocs] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [/<...>/Makefile:1806: htmldocs] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [/<...>/Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/<...>/my-output'
> make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This would surprise innocent devs who are kindly willing to test docs build.
>
> I think you need to tame its behavior and make it emit a proper warning and
> continue building docs in case of such predictable user errors.
Totally agree.
Thanks.
> Am I asking you something unreasonable?
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
>
>> As kernel-doc is now fully an Sphinx extension,
>> it now signalizes to Sphinx that the build has failed.
>>
>> Yet, it should have produced some warnings. Maybe we need to specify a
>> different log level with Sphinx to make it happen. I'll double check it
>> and send a fix later on to kernel-doc.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mauro
>
>
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists