lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250519062605.2357-1-21cnbao@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 18:26:05 +1200
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: ryncsn@...il.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	baohua@...nel.org,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	bhe@...hat.com,
	chrisl@...nel.org,
	david@...hat.com,
	hannes@...xchg.org,
	hughd@...gle.com,
	kaleshsingh@...gle.com,
	kasong@...cent.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	nphamcs@...il.com,
	ryan.roberts@....com,
	shikemeng@...weicloud.com,
	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	willy@...radead.org,
	ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	yosryahmed@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/28] mm, swap: rearrange swap cluster definition and helpers

> From: Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>

> @@ -889,10 +849,8 @@ static unsigned long cluster_alloc_swap_entry(struct swap_info_struct *si, int o
>  		/* Serialize HDD SWAP allocation for each device. */
>  		spin_lock(&si->global_cluster_lock);
>  		offset = si->global_cluster->next[order];
> -		if (offset == SWAP_ENTRY_INVALID)
> -			goto new_cluster;

We are implicitly dropping this. Does it mean the current code is wrong?
Do we need some clarification about this?

>  
> -		ci = lock_cluster(si, offset);
> +		ci = swap_lock_cluster(si, offset);
>  		/* Cluster could have been used by another order */
>  		if (cluster_is_usable(ci, order)) {
>  			if (cluster_is_empty(ci))

Thanks
Barry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ