[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH0uvohxb4gvHYswCZMvCrrOn=0qSOeOaYyDVPEFb4GPhwntgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 16:36:23 -0700
From: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf trace: Increase syscall handler map size to 1024
Hello Namhyung,
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 4:25 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> The syscalls_sys_{enter,exit} map in augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf.c has
> max entries of 512. Usually syscall numbers are smaller than this but
> x86 has x32 ABI where syscalls start from 512.
>
> That makes trace__init_syscalls_bpf_prog_array_maps() fail in the middle
> of the loop when it accesses those keys. As the loop iteration is not
> ordered by syscall numbers anymore, the failure can affect non-x32
> syscalls.
>
> Let's increase the map size to 1024 so that it can handle those ABIs
> too. While most systems won't need this, increasing the size will be
> safer for potential future changes.
>
> Cc: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>
Thanks,
Howard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists