[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMArcTWQY5FW5x3x-OM6tHh6nX4Fu91e7GNSQ97x6Qy80gCH6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 15:45:17 +0900
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, sdf@...ichev.me,
praan@...gle.com, shivajikant@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/9] net: devmem: move list_add to net_devmem_bind_dmabuf.
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:35 AM Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> It's annoying for the list_add to be outside net_devmem_bind_dmabuf, but
> the list_del is in net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf. Make it consistent by
> having both the list_add/del be inside the net_devmem_[un]bind_dmabuf.
>
> Cc: ap420073@...il.com
> Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>
Hi Mina,
Thanks a lot for this work!
I tested it and it works well.
Tested-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
Thanks!
Taehee Yoo
>
> ---
> net/core/devmem.c | 5 ++++-
> net/core/devmem.h | 5 ++++-
> net/core/netdev-genl.c | 8 ++------
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c
> index 0dba26baae18..b3a62ca0df65 100644
> --- a/net/core/devmem.c
> +++ b/net/core/devmem.c
> @@ -178,7 +178,8 @@ int net_devmem_bind_dmabuf_to_queue(struct net_device *dev, u32 rxq_idx,
> struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *
> net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev,
> enum dma_data_direction direction,
> - unsigned int dmabuf_fd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> + unsigned int dmabuf_fd, struct netdev_nl_sock *priv,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding;
> static u32 id_alloc_next;
> @@ -299,6 +300,8 @@ net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev,
> if (err < 0)
> goto err_free_chunks;
>
> + list_add(&binding->list, &priv->bindings);
> +
> return binding;
>
> err_free_chunks:
> diff --git a/net/core/devmem.h b/net/core/devmem.h
> index 58d8d3c1b945..e7ba77050b8f 100644
> --- a/net/core/devmem.h
> +++ b/net/core/devmem.h
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> #define _NET_DEVMEM_H
>
> #include <net/netmem.h>
> +#include <net/netdev_netlink.h>
>
> struct netlink_ext_ack;
>
> @@ -82,7 +83,8 @@ void __net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_free(struct work_struct *wq);
> struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *
> net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev,
> enum dma_data_direction direction,
> - unsigned int dmabuf_fd, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> + unsigned int dmabuf_fd, struct netdev_nl_sock *priv,
> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
> struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *net_devmem_lookup_dmabuf(u32 id);
> void net_devmem_unbind_dmabuf(struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding);
> int net_devmem_bind_dmabuf_to_queue(struct net_device *dev, u32 rxq_idx,
> @@ -170,6 +172,7 @@ static inline void __net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_free(struct work_struct *wq)
> static inline struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *
> net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int dmabuf_fd,
> enum dma_data_direction direction,
> + struct netdev_nl_sock *priv,
> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> {
> return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
> diff --git a/net/core/netdev-genl.c b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> index 762570dcda61..2afa7b2141aa 100644
> --- a/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> +++ b/net/core/netdev-genl.c
> @@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> }
>
> binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(netdev, DMA_FROM_DEVICE, dmabuf_fd,
> - info->extack);
> + priv, info->extack);
> if (IS_ERR(binding)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(binding);
> goto err_unlock;
> @@ -943,8 +943,6 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_rx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> goto err_unbind;
> }
>
> - list_add(&binding->list, &priv->bindings);
> -
> nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_DMABUF_ID, binding->id);
> genlmsg_end(rsp, hdr);
>
> @@ -1020,15 +1018,13 @@ int netdev_nl_bind_tx_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> goto err_unlock_netdev;
> }
>
> - binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(netdev, DMA_TO_DEVICE, dmabuf_fd,
> + binding = net_devmem_bind_dmabuf(netdev, DMA_TO_DEVICE, dmabuf_fd, priv,
> info->extack);
> if (IS_ERR(binding)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(binding);
> goto err_unlock_netdev;
> }
>
> - list_add(&binding->list, &priv->bindings);
> -
> nla_put_u32(rsp, NETDEV_A_DMABUF_ID, binding->id);
> genlmsg_end(rsp, hdr);
>
> --
> 2.49.0.1101.gccaa498523-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists