[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCriAfYTS7Xz3so9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 09:47:13 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: dave.hansen@...el.com, jarkko@...nel.org, seanjc@...gle.com,
kai.huang@...el.com, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
asit.k.mallick@...el.com, vincent.r.scarlata@...el.com,
chongc@...gle.com, erdemaktas@...gle.com, vannapurve@...gle.com,
dionnaglaze@...gle.com, bondarn@...gle.com, scott.raynor@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_SGX_EUPDATESVN
feature flag
* Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com> wrote:
> Add a flag indicating whenever ENCLS[EUPDATESVN] SGX instruction
> is supported. This will be used by SGX driver to perform CPU
> SVN updates.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 1 +
> tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> index 6c2c152d8a67..ed0c0fa5822a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
> @@ -481,6 +481,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_HETEROGENEOUS_CORES (21*32 + 6) /* Heterogeneous Core Topology */
> #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_WORKLOAD_CLASS (21*32 + 7) /* Workload Classification */
> #define X86_FEATURE_PREFER_YMM (21*32 + 8) /* Avoid ZMM registers due to downclocking */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_SGX_EUPDATESVN (21*32 + 9) /* Support for ENCLS[EUPDATESVN] instruction */
Please base the patches on the latest x86 tree, there's been two
additions already in this area.
> /*
> * BUG word(s)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> index 16f3ca30626a..a7e1fcedca3c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ static const struct cpuid_bit cpuid_bits[] = {
> { X86_FEATURE_PER_THREAD_MBA, CPUID_ECX, 0, 0x00000010, 3 },
> { X86_FEATURE_SGX1, CPUID_EAX, 0, 0x00000012, 0 },
> { X86_FEATURE_SGX2, CPUID_EAX, 1, 0x00000012, 0 },
> + { X86_FEATURE_SGX_EUPDATESVN, CPUID_EAX, 10, 0x00000012, 0 },
> { X86_FEATURE_SGX_EDECCSSA, CPUID_EAX, 11, 0x00000012, 0 },
> { X86_FEATURE_HW_PSTATE, CPUID_EDX, 7, 0x80000007, 0 },
> { X86_FEATURE_CPB, CPUID_EDX, 9, 0x80000007, 0 },
So it should be obvious at a glance that this new line doesn't follow
the coding convention of the surrounding lines...
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists