[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250519104012.acyfoffelestwgtt@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 16:10:12 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cpufreq: scmi: Skip SCMI devices that aren't used by
the CPUs
On 14-05-25, 20:53, Mike Tipton wrote:
> Currently, all SCMI devices with performance domains attempt to register
> a cpufreq driver, even if their performance domains aren't used to
> control the CPUs. The cpufreq framework only supports registering a
> single driver, so only the first device will succeed. And if that device
> isn't used for the CPUs, then cpufreq will scale the wrong domains.
>
> To avoid this, return early from scmi_cpufreq_probe() if the probing
> SCMI device isn't referenced by the CPU device phandles.
>
> This keeps the existing assumption that all CPUs are controlled by a
> single SCMI device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Tipton <quic_mdtipton@...cinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> Tested-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists