[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250519-geek-slept-8cae4fc6d548@spud>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 13:01:50 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>,
Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Chao Wei <chao.wei@...hgo.com>,
sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: riscv: add Sophgo SG2042_EVB_V1.X
bindings
On Sat, May 17, 2025 at 01:11:46AM +0800, Han Gao wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 12:22 AM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 10:08:59PM +0800, Han Gao wrote:
> > > Add DT binding documentation for the Sophgo SG2042_EVB_V1.X board [1].
> >
> > 1.x? Is the v1.0 something people can get their hands on, or just the
> > v1.1?
> > What differences do the boards have that are minimal enough that
> > specific compatibles would not be required?
> >
>
> First of all, v1.1 and v1.0 are compatible boards.
> There is no difference between v1.1 and v1.0 from dts.
>
> Both v1.1 and v1.0 have been discontinued.
> About 80 pieces of v1.1 are in the hands of community developers.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists