[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb78d791abe34d9cbac30e75e7bec373@realtek.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 12:16:11 +0000
From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
To: "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"horms@...nel.org"
<horms@...nel.org>,
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Larry Chiu
<larry.chiu@...ltek.com>, Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2] rtase: Use min() instead of min_t()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2025 2:34 PM
> To: kuba@...nel.org
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; pabeni@...hat.com;
> andrew+netdev@...n.ch; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; horms@...nel.org; Ping-Ke Shih
> <pkshih@...ltek.com>; Larry Chiu <larry.chiu@...ltek.com>; Justin Lai
> <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>; Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
> Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] rtase: Use min() instead of min_t()
>
> Use min() instead of min_t() to avoid the possibility of casting to the
> wrong type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - Remove the Fixes tag.
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> index 6251548d50ff..8c902eaeb5ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> @@ -1983,7 +1983,7 @@ static u16 rtase_calc_time_mitigation(u32 time_us)
> u8 msb, time_count, time_unit;
> u16 int_miti;
>
> - time_us = min_t(int, time_us, RTASE_MITI_MAX_TIME);
> + time_us = min(time_us, RTASE_MITI_MAX_TIME);
>
> msb = fls(time_us);
> if (msb >= RTASE_MITI_COUNT_BIT_NUM) {
> @@ -2005,7 +2005,7 @@ static u16 rtase_calc_packet_num_mitigation(u16
> pkt_num)
> u8 msb, pkt_num_count, pkt_num_unit;
> u16 int_miti;
>
> - pkt_num = min_t(int, pkt_num, RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM);
> + pkt_num = min(pkt_num, RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM);
>
> if (pkt_num > 60) {
> pkt_num_unit = RTASE_MITI_MAX_PKT_NUM_IDX;
> --
> 2.34.1
Hi reviewers,
I apologize for the interruption, I would like to ask why this patch is
rejected on patchwork.
Justin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists