[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kvckrtgbdxlzezxzn5xe6owmbaxa5rygknsv3hne32awfc7y5s@k2akbs6u7tkr>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 15:47:26 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>
To: Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@...il.com>
Cc: dimitri.fedrau@...bherr.com, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pwm: mc33xs2410: add support for temperature sensors
Hello Dimitri,
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 02:40:28PM +0200, Dimitri Fedrau wrote:
> Perfering IS_REACHABLE over IS_ENABLED is fine for me. Is there a reason
> why you just didn't replace IS_ENABLED with IS_REACHABLE ?
Because if (IS_REACHABLE(...)) is nicer than #if IS_REACHABLE(...). It
has better compile coverage and is easier to parse for a human.
Best regards
Uwe
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists