linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: Unnecessary linesplit in __pci_setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9dd35654-e6eb-a531-457c-93ddc5ff371d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 16:59:53 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
    LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] PCI: Unnecessary linesplit in __pci_setup_bridge()

On Fri, 16 May 2025, Krzysztof Wilczyński wrote:

> [...]
> > -	pci_info(bridge, "PCI bridge to %pR\n",
> > -		 &bus->busn_res);
> > +	pci_info(bridge, "PCI bridge to %pR\n", &bus->busn_res);
> 
> I don't know if there still exists such a thing as "trivial patches
> maintainer" any more, so I will pull this.
> 
> I gather, it must have bothered you a bit. That said, Ilpo... your
> expertise and time could have been spent differently. :)

It doesn't take long to do patches like this and I don't search for things 
like this intentionally nor focus on them. It's just that I do encounter 
these simple ones too while I'm spending my expertise differently :-). You 
can check my track record on discovering e.g. real concurrency issues 
recently so I hope you can give a bit slack on a few trivial patches here 
and there ;-).

-- 
 i.