[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250519223244317Gbg_lRkV5N9i15dnPMo63@zte.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 22:32:44 +0800 (CST)
From: <yang.yang29@....com.cn>
To: <jiang.kun2@....com.cn>, <wang.yaxin@....com.cn>
Cc: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <xu.xin16@....com.cn>, <bbonev@...uan.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bsingharora@...il.com>,
<jiang.kun2@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux next v2] taskstats: adjust indentation of
xxx_delay_max/min
> adjust indentation of xxx_delay_max/min in struct taskstats.
I think fixing indentation alone isn't worth a separate patch. There
are still a lot work to do, for example: reduce redundant assignment
and calculation code in delayacct_add_tsk(). So should we fix the
indentation as part of the next patch.
<div class="zcontentRow"><p>> adjust indentation of xxx_delay_max/min in struct taskstats.</p><p>I think fixing indentation alone isn't worth a separate patch. There</p><p>are still a lot work to do, for example: reduce redundant assignment</p><p>and calculation code in delayacct_add_tsk(). So should we fix the</p><p>indentation as part of the next patch.</p></div>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists