[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1079afa6-72cc-49df-9158-70428fd6918f@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 20:06:38 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Shinji Nomoto (Fujitsu)" <fj5851bi@...itsu.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: hwmon: acpi_power_meter: Add information about
enabling the power capping feature.
On 5/19/25 19:54, Shinji Nomoto (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Guenter wrote:
>> This is potentially unsafe if not really supported, which needs to be mentioned.
>
> Thank you for your comment.
>
> I will add a note of "potentially unsafe" in v2.
> We are considering installing ACPI power meter on a machine under development, but I believe that the DMI (SYS_VENDOR) check included in the driver has too broad a scope.
Sorry, you lost me. Presumably your system would not be an IBM system.
Nothing prevents you from adding a more specific DMI entry (or more
than one). Many DMI matches are for the system vendor, the board vendor,
the product name, or even the BIOS vendor, date, and/or version. Every
value in enum dmi_field can be matched.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists