[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73c27a5a4c814a5a9cdf6319314f8480@realtek.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 03:19:41 +0000
From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@...ltek.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"horms@...nel.org"
<horms@...nel.org>,
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
Larry Chiu
<larry.chiu@...ltek.com>, Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2] rtase: Use min() instead of min_t()
> On Mon, 19 May 2025 15:32:18 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 May 2025 12:16:11 +0000 Justin Lai wrote:
> > > I apologize for the interruption, I would like to ask why this patch
> > > is rejected on patchwork.
> >
> > Hm, unclear, sorry about that.
>
> It doesn't apply, perhaps that's why? Please rebase and repost.
Hi Jakub,
Thank you for your reply. I will rebase and repost.
Thanks,
Justin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists