| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e061d09b-f4bf-4fb3-bb16-bd85fc33b644@lucifer.local>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 16:57:26 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez <Ignacio.MorenoGonzalez@...a.com>,
Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, pbonzini@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] KVM: s390: rename PROT_NONE to PROT_TYPE_DUMMY
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2025 16:24:10 +0100
> Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 05:10:09PM +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> > > On Mon, 19 May 2025 15:56:57 +0100
> > > Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The enum type prot_type declared in arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c declares an
> > > > unfortunate identifier within it - PROT_NONE.
> > > >
> > > > This clashes with the protection bit define from the uapi for mmap()
> > > > declared in include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h, which is indeed what
> > > > those casually reading this code would assume this to refer to.
> > > >
> > > > This means that any changes which subsequently alter headers in any way
> > > > which results in the uapi header being imported here will cause build
> > > > errors.
> > > >
> > > > Resolve the issue by renaming PROT_NONE to PROT_TYPE_DUMMY.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> > > > Suggested-by: Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez <Ignacio.MorenoGonzalez@...a.com>
> > > > Fixes: b3cefd6bf16e ("KVM: s390: Pass initialized arg even if unused")
> > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505140943.IgHDa9s7-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Ignacio Moreno Gonzalez <Ignacio.MorenoGonzalez@...a.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Yang Shi <yang@...amperecomputing.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
> > >
> > > if you had put me in CC, you would have gotten this yesterday already:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Thanks and apologies for not cc-ing you, clearly my mistake.
> >
> > Though I would suggest your level of grumpiness here is a little over the
> > top under the circumstances :) we maintainers must scale our grumpiness
> > accordingly...
>
> it was not meant to be grumpy, sorry if it came through that way!
Haha no worries, text is a bad medium, I should maybe have inferred a ':P' at
the end of that line ;)
But absolutely my bad for not cc'in I'm normally good with that... and have
moaned at people for not cc'ing me before :P
Anyway thanks to you guys for being helpful with this change in general, hoping
we can land it either in RC7 or if not as a hotpatch for 6.16.
We shall see :)
Cheers, Lorenzo
>
> >
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > Separated out from [0] as problem found in other patch in series.
> > > >
> > > > [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1747338438.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com/
> > > >
> > > > arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c | 8 ++++----
> > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> > > > index f6fded15633a..4e5654ad1604 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> > > > @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ enum prot_type {
> > > > PROT_TYPE_DAT = 3,
> > > > PROT_TYPE_IEP = 4,
> > > > /* Dummy value for passing an initialized value when code != PGM_PROTECTION */
> > > > - PROT_NONE,
> > > > + PROT_TYPE_DUMMY,
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > static int trans_exc_ending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int code, unsigned long gva, u8 ar,
> > > > @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ static int trans_exc_ending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int code, unsigned long gva,
> > > > switch (code) {
> > > > case PGM_PROTECTION:
> > > > switch (prot) {
> > > > - case PROT_NONE:
> > > > + case PROT_TYPE_DUMMY:
> > > > /* We should never get here, acts like termination */
> > > > WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> > > > break;
> > > > @@ -804,7 +804,7 @@ static int guest_range_to_gpas(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, u8 ar,
> > > > gpa = kvm_s390_real_to_abs(vcpu, ga);
> > > > if (!kvm_is_gpa_in_memslot(vcpu->kvm, gpa)) {
> > > > rc = PGM_ADDRESSING;
> > > > - prot = PROT_NONE;
> > > > + prot = PROT_TYPE_DUMMY;
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > > if (rc)
> > > > @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ int access_guest_with_key(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long ga, u8 ar,
> > > > if (rc == PGM_PROTECTION)
> > > > prot = PROT_TYPE_KEYC;
> > > > else
> > > > - prot = PROT_NONE;
> > > > + prot = PROT_TYPE_DUMMY;
> > > > rc = trans_exc_ending(vcpu, rc, ga, ar, mode, prot, terminate);
> > > > }
> > > > out_unlock:
> > > > --
> > > > 2.49.0
> > > >
> > >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists