linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250520181125.4155631-1-joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 11:11:24 -0700
From: Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: gourry@...rry.net,
	harry.yoo@...cle.com,
	ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	honggyu.kim@...com,
	yunjeong.mun@...com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	rakie.kim@...com,
	rafael@...nel.org,
	lenb@...nel.org,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
	dave.jiang@...el.com,
	horen.chuang@...ux.dev,
	hannes@...xchg.org,
	osalvador@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning

On Tue, 20 May 2025 10:53:19 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 May 2025 07:12:35 -0700 Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > Changelog
> > v9:
> > - Code cleanups & wordsmithing
> > - Added tags for Honggyu and Ying
> 
> Honggyu's Reviewed-by is the only change I'm seeing between v8 and v9,
> which is unexpected?
> 

Hello Andrew,

The code cleanups & wordsmithing were part of the fixlets that I submitted,
so if you are diffing against the version of v8 with the fixlets already in,
all you should see as diffs are Honggyu's review and test tag, as well as
Ying's review tag.

I was not very familiar with the fixlet process, so I imagined that I needed
so submit a new fixlet to add the 3 tags. If that is not the case (and you
can just change the tags without adding a new fixlet) perhaps we can keep
v8, just with the additional tags so we can keep the patch in the unstable
branch?

Sorry for the confusion and the noise, I am happy with whatever decision
you make! Thank you for your help, as always.
Joshua