[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250520192846.9614-3-bmasney@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 15:28:46 -0400
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
To: sboyd@...nel.org
Cc: mturquette@...libre.com,
mripard@...nel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clk: test: remove kunit_skip() for divider tests that have been fixed
These issues have been fixed in the clk core, so let's remove the
kunit_skip().
Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@...hat.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk_test.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
index e6df1d2274b2..3f0bc44c06fd 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk_test.c
@@ -788,8 +788,6 @@ static void clk_test_rate_change_sibling_div_div_2(struct kunit *test)
struct clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_context *ctx = test->priv;
int ret;
- kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
-
ret = clk_set_rate(ctx->child1_clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_48_MHZ);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
@@ -808,8 +806,6 @@ static void clk_test_rate_change_sibling_div_div_3(struct kunit *test)
struct clk_rate_change_sibling_div_div_context *ctx = test->priv;
int ret;
- kunit_skip(test, "This needs to be fixed in the core.");
-
ret = clk_set_rate(ctx->child1_clk, DUMMY_CLOCK_RATE_16_MHZ);
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, ret, 0);
--
2.49.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists