[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <wc45nu55l7venjmz7mllvxofd2j2ymmj35efefrejaupnyf5xy@27k6glye4n52>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 22:51:02 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: vincent.knecht@...loo.org
Cc: Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
André Apitzsch <git@...tzsch.eu>,
phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] media: qcom: camss: Add support for MSM8939
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:39:07PM +0200, Vincent Knecht via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@...loo.org>
>
> The camera subsystem for the MSM8939 is the same as MSM8916 except with
> 3 CSID instead of 2, and some higher clock rates.
>
> As a quirk, this SoC needs writing values to 2 VFE VBIF registers
> (see downstream msm8939-camera.dtsi vbif-{regs,settings} properties).
> This fixes black stripes across sensor and garbage in CSID TPG outputs.
>
> Add support for the MSM8939 camera subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@...loo.org>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-csiphy.c | 1 +
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-ispif.c | 8 +-
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-4-1.c | 11 ++
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-vbif.c | 7 +
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe.c | 1 +
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.c | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss.h | 1 +
> 7 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> @@ -742,6 +744,15 @@ static void vfe_set_qos(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> writel_relaxed(val, vfe->base + VFE_0_BUS_BDG_QOS_CFG_5);
> writel_relaxed(val, vfe->base + VFE_0_BUS_BDG_QOS_CFG_6);
> writel_relaxed(val7, vfe->base + VFE_0_BUS_BDG_QOS_CFG_7);
> +
> + /* SoC-specific VBIF settings */
> + if (vfe->res->has_vbif) {
> + ret = vfe_vbif_apply_settings(vfe);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err_ratelimited(vfe->camss->dev,
> + "VFE: VBIF error %d\n",
> + ret);
> + }
> }
This chunk should probably go to the previous patch.
>
> static void vfe_set_ds(struct vfe_device *vfe)
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists