lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9=mrZnvME=6++fMNaLFZ8a5DXib5ZLuaYorFZv01GBMWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 16:08:43 -0400
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Cc: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, Nicolas Schier <nicolas@...sle.eu>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: kbuild: rebuild if `.clippy.toml` changes

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 3:53 PM Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> We rarely modify `.clippy.toml`, but currently we do not rebuild if that
> happens, thus it is easy to miss possible changes in lints.
>
> Thus rebuild in case of changes.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
> Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1151
> Fixes: 7d56786edcbd ("rust: introduce `.clippy.toml`")
> Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
> ---
>  rust/Makefile | 12 +++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/Makefile b/rust/Makefile
> index 3aca903a7d08..107299c32065 100644
> --- a/rust/Makefile
> +++ b/rust/Makefile
> @@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ rustdoc_test_quiet=--test-args -q
>  rustdoc_test_kernel_quiet=>/dev/null
>  endif
>
> +ifeq ($(KBUILD_CLIPPY),1)
> +       clippy_toml := $(srctree)/.clippy.toml
> +endif
> +
>  core-cfgs = \
>      --cfg no_fp_fmt_parse
>
> @@ -405,11 +409,12 @@ quiet_cmd_rustc_procmacro = $(RUSTC_OR_CLIPPY_QUIET) P $@
>                 --crate-name $(patsubst lib%.$(libmacros_extension),%,$(notdir $@)) $<
>
>  # Procedural macros can only be used with the `rustc` that compiled it.
> -$(obj)/$(libmacros_name): $(src)/macros/lib.rs FORCE
> +$(obj)/$(libmacros_name): $(src)/macros/lib.rs $(clippy_toml) FORCE
>         +$(call if_changed_dep,rustc_procmacro)
>
>  $(obj)/$(libpin_init_internal_name): private rustc_target_flags = --cfg kernel
> -$(obj)/$(libpin_init_internal_name): $(src)/pin-init/internal/src/lib.rs FORCE
> +$(obj)/$(libpin_init_internal_name): $(src)/pin-init/internal/src/lib.rs \
> +    $(clippy_toml) FORCE
>         +$(call if_changed_dep,rustc_procmacro)
>
>  quiet_cmd_rustc_library = $(if $(skip_clippy),RUSTC,$(RUSTC_OR_CLIPPY_QUIET)) L $@
> @@ -495,7 +500,8 @@ endif
>
>  $(obj)/compiler_builtins.o: private skip_gendwarfksyms = 1
>  $(obj)/compiler_builtins.o: private rustc_objcopy = -w -W '__*'
> -$(obj)/compiler_builtins.o: $(src)/compiler_builtins.rs $(obj)/core.o FORCE
> +$(obj)/compiler_builtins.o: $(src)/compiler_builtins.rs $(obj)/core.o \
> +    $(clippy_toml) FORCE
>         +$(call if_changed_rule,rustc_library)
>
>  $(obj)/pin_init.o: private skip_gendwarfksyms = 1

This is only changing 3 targets, right? libmacros, libpin_init, and
compiler_builtins. Can you help me understand why only these need to
change? Is it because these are leaf nodes in the graph?

The `rusttest` target wouldn't rebuild properly, I think? Is it
possible to apply this rule to all rust targets, rather than
individual ones?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ