[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <22502c16-2733-4d48-892c-3e09dee1aa28@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 14:18:12 +0800
From: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, kirill.shutemov@...el.com, tabba@...gle.com,
ackerleytng@...gle.com, quic_eberman@...cinc.com, michael.roth@....com,
david@...hat.com, vannapurve@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, jroedel@...e.de,
thomas.lendacky@....com, pgonda@...gle.com, zhiquan1.li@...el.com,
fan.du@...el.com, jun.miao@...el.com, ira.weiny@...el.com,
isaku.yamahata@...el.com, xiaoyao.li@...el.com, chao.p.peng@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/21] KVM: TDX: Support huge page splitting with
exclusive kvm->mmu_lock
On 4/24/2025 11:08 AM, Yan Zhao wrote:
[...]
> +
> +int tdx_sept_split_private_spt(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, enum pg_level level,
> + void *private_spt)
> +{
> + struct page *page = virt_to_page(private_spt);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (KVM_BUG_ON(to_kvm_tdx(kvm)->state != TD_STATE_RUNNABLE || level != PG_LEVEL_2M, kvm))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = tdx_sept_zap_private_spte(kvm, gfn, level, page);
> + if (ret <= 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + tdx_track(kvm);
It may worth a helper for the zap and track code.
It's the some code as what in tdx_sept_remove_private_spte().
So that they can share the code, including the bug check for HKID and the
comments.
> +
> + return tdx_spte_demote_private_spte(kvm, gfn, level, page);
> +}
> +
>
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists