[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c0a856-c828-4521-bddc-45ee038d0fa7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 08:46:43 +0100
From: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, david@...hat.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, hannes@...xchg.org, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
riel@...riel.com, ziy@...dia.com, laoar.shao@...il.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, npache@...hat.com,
ryan.roberts@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, jannh@...gle.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] prctl: introduce PR_SET/GET_THP_POLICY
On 20/05/2025 06:14, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> NACK the whole series.
>
> Usama - I explicitly said make this an RFC, so we can see what this
> approach _looks like_ to further examine it, to which you agreed. And now
> you've sent it non-RFC. That's not acceptable.
>
> If you agree to something in review, it's not then optional as to whether
> you do it.
It was a bit late yesterday and I completely forgot to change --subject-prefix="PATCH v3"
to --subject-prefix="RFC v3". Mistakes happen and I apologize.
I agreed to make it RFC and had full intention of doing that.
Would you like me to resend it with the RFC tag?
Thanks,
Usama
Powered by blists - more mailing lists