lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c0a856-c828-4521-bddc-45ee038d0fa7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 08:46:43 +0100
From: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, david@...hat.com,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, hannes@...xchg.org, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
 riel@...riel.com, ziy@...dia.com, laoar.shao@...il.com,
 baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, npache@...hat.com,
 ryan.roberts@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, jannh@...gle.com,
 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] prctl: introduce PR_SET/GET_THP_POLICY



On 20/05/2025 06:14, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> NACK the whole series.
> 
> Usama - I explicitly said make this an RFC, so we can see what this
> approach _looks like_ to further examine it, to which you agreed. And now
> you've sent it non-RFC. That's not acceptable.
> 
> If you agree to something in review, it's not then optional as to whether
> you do it.

It was a bit late yesterday and I completely forgot to change --subject-prefix="PATCH v3" 
to --subject-prefix="RFC v3". Mistakes happen and I apologize.

I agreed to make it RFC and had full intention of doing that.
Would you like me to resend it with the RFC tag?

Thanks,
Usama

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ