[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <kmcsuqlmawjqvixoevqa2waf2smznvbtbgw7drlbwgegfojz5x@vziujze5nzsb>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 10:41:52 +0200
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Wentao Liang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: qup: Add error handling in qup_i2c_xfer_v2()
Hi Wentao,
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 10:19:18PM +0800, Wentao Liang wrote:
> The qup_i2c_xfer_v2() calls the qup_i2c_change_state() but does
> not check its return value. A proper implementation can be
> found in qup_i2c_xfer().
>
> Add error handling for qup_i2c_change_state(). If the function
> fails, return the error code.
>
> Fixes: 7545c7dba169 ("i2c: qup: reorganization of driver code to remove polling for qup v2")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.17
no need to Cc stable here, it's not such a big issue.
> Signed-off-by: Wentao Liang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
> index da20b4487c9a..2477f570fe86 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c
> @@ -1538,7 +1538,7 @@ static int qup_i2c_xfer_v2(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> int num)
> {
> struct qup_i2c_dev *qup = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> - int ret, idx = 0;
> + int ret, err, idx = 0;
>
> qup->bus_err = 0;
> qup->qup_err = 0;
> @@ -1588,7 +1588,9 @@ static int qup_i2c_xfer_v2(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> ret = qup_i2c_bus_active(qup, ONE_BYTE);
>
> if (!ret)
> - qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RESET_STATE);
> + err = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RESET_STATE);
This check was removed on purpose, not by accident in the commit
you pointed out in the Fixes tag. On the other hand I agree that
this needs to be checked, perhaps restoring the original code:
if (!ret)
ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RESET_STATE);
if (ret == 0)
ret = num;
What is exactly that you are trying to fix here? What is the
error you have faced?
Thanks,
Andi
> + if (err)
> + return err;
>
> if (ret == 0)
> ret = num;
PS: your code can be refactored in a way that we don't need this
extra variable. E.g., something like this:
if (!ret)
ret = qup_i2c_bus_active(qup, ONE_BYTE);
if (!ret) {
ret = qup_i2c_change_state(qup, QUP_RESET_STATE);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = num;
}
Looks the same, no? But I think the original version should work
better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists