[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALOAHbAa7DY6+hO4RJtjg-MS+cnUmsiPXX8KS1MKSfgy6HLYAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 17:24:16 +0800
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org, mhocko@...e.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
zokeefe@...gle.com, surenb@...gle.com, jglisse@...gle.com, cl@...two.org,
jack@...e.cz, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, will@...nel.org, tiwai@...e.de,
catalin.marinas@....com, anshuman.khandual@....com, dev.jain@....com,
raquini@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com,
yang@...amperecomputing.com, thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com,
vishal.moola@...il.com, sunnanyong@...wei.com, usamaarif642@...il.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, ziy@...dia.com, shuah@...nel.org,
peterx@...hat.com, willy@...radead.org, ryan.roberts@....com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, baohua@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, mhiramat@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
corbet@....net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] mm: introduce THP deferred setting
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 11:41 AM Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> This series is a follow-up to [1], which adds mTHP support to khugepaged.
> mTHP khugepaged support is a "loose" dependency for the sysfs/sysctl
> configs to make sense. Without it global="defer" and mTHP="inherit" case
> is "undefined" behavior.
>
> We've seen cases were customers switching from RHEL7 to RHEL8 see a
> significant increase in the memory footprint for the same workloads.
>
> Through our investigations we found that a large contributing factor to
> the increase in RSS was an increase in THP usage.
>
> For workloads like MySQL, or when using allocators like jemalloc, it is
> often recommended to set /transparent_hugepages/enabled=never. This is
> in part due to performance degradations and increased memory waste.
>
> This series introduces enabled=defer, this setting acts as a middle
> ground between always and madvise. If the mapping is MADV_HUGEPAGE, the
> page fault handler will act normally, making a hugepage if possible. If
> the allocation is not MADV_HUGEPAGE, then the page fault handler will
> default to the base size allocation. The caveat is that khugepaged can
> still operate on pages that are not MADV_HUGEPAGE.
>
> This allows for three things... one, applications specifically designed to
> use hugepages will get them, and two, applications that don't use
> hugepages can still benefit from them without aggressively inserting
> THPs at every possible chance. This curbs the memory waste, and defers
> the use of hugepages to khugepaged. Khugepaged can then scan the memory
> for eligible collapsing. Lastly there is the added benefit for those who
> want THPs but experience higher latency PFs. Now you can get base page
> performance at the PF handler and Hugepage performance for those mappings
> after they collapse.
>
> Admins may want to lower max_ptes_none, if not, khugepaged may
> aggressively collapse single allocations into hugepages.
>
> TESTING:
> - Built for x86_64, aarch64, ppc64le, and s390x
> - selftests mm
> - In [1] I provided a script [2] that has multiple access patterns
> - lots of general use.
> - redis testing. This test was my original case for the defer mode. What I
> was able to prove was that THP=always leads to increased max_latency
> cases; hence why it is recommended to disable THPs for redis servers.
> However with 'defer' we dont have the max_latency spikes and can still
> get the system to utilize THPs. I further tested this with the mTHP
> defer setting and found that redis (and probably other jmalloc users)
> can utilize THPs via defer (+mTHP defer) without a large latency
> penalty and some potential gains. I uploaded some mmtest results
> here[3] which compares:
> stock+thp=never
> stock+(m)thp=always
> khugepaged-mthp + defer (max_ptes_none=64)
>
> The results show that (m)THPs can cause some throughput regression in
> some cases, but also has gains in other cases. The mTHP+defer results
> have more gains and less losses over the (m)THP=always case.
>
> V6 Changes:
> - nits
> - rebased dependent series and added review tags
>
> V5 Changes:
> - rebased dependent series
> - added reviewed-by tag on 2/4
>
> V4 Changes:
> - Minor Documentation fixes
> - rebased the dependent series [1] onto mm-unstable
> commit 0e68b850b1d3 ("vmalloc: use atomic_long_add_return_relaxed()")
>
> V3 Changes:
> - Combined the documentation commits into one, and moved a section to the
> khugepaged mthp patchset
>
> V2 Changes:
> - base changes on mTHP khugepaged support
> - Fix selftests parsing issue
> - add mTHP defer option
> - add mTHP defer Documentation
>
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250515032226.128900-1-npache@redhat.com/
> [2] - https://gitlab.com/npache/khugepaged_mthp_test
> [3] - https://people.redhat.com/npache/mthp_khugepaged_defer/testoutput2/output.html
>
> Nico Pache (4):
> mm: defer THP insertion to khugepaged
> mm: document (m)THP defer usage
> khugepaged: add defer option to mTHP options
> selftests: mm: add defer to thp setting parser
>
> Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst | 31 +++++++---
> include/linux/huge_mm.h | 18 +++++-
> mm/huge_memory.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++---
> mm/khugepaged.c | 8 +--
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/thp_settings.c | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/mm/thp_settings.h | 1 +
> 6 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
Hello Nico,
Upon reviewing the series, it occurred to me that BPF could solve this
more cleanly. Adding a 'tva_flags' parameter to the BPF hook would
handle this case and future scenarios without requiring new modes. The
BPF mode could then serve as a unified solution.
--
Regards
Yafang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists