[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DA0YJ89890ND.3NKPS3RWC012P@cknow.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 13:39:18 +0200
From: "Diederik de Haas" <didi.debian@...ow.org>
To: "Yao Zi" <ziyao@...root.org>, "Vinod Koul" <vkoul@...nel.org>, "Kishon
Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@...nel.org>, "Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, "Conor Dooley"
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@...ech.de>, "Frank Wang"
<frank.wang@...k-chips.com>, "Andy Yan" <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
"Cristian Ciocaltea" <cristian.ciocaltea@...labora.com>, "Detlev Casanova"
<detlev.casanova@...labora.com>, "Shresth Prasad"
<shresthprasad7@...il.com>, "Chukun Pan" <amadeus@....edu.cn>, "Jonas
Karlman" <jonas@...boo.se>
Cc: <linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] phy: rockchip: naneng-combphy: Add SoC prefix to
register definitions
On Tue May 20, 2025 at 1:12 PM CEST, Yao Zi wrote:
> If putting RK3528 at first really confuses you, I'd like to add some
> extra comments to explicitly split these two kinds of register layouts
> apart and claim they aren't compatible. Although to me it's somehow
> obvious, as most definitions are prefixed with either RK3528 or RK3568.
No need. This is just another PEBKAC issue.
Cheers,
Diederik
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists