[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aCyH0KdvxLWEKdA1@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 06:46:56 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Martin Wilck <mwilck@...e.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@...hat.com>,
Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
hreitz@...hat.com, mpatocka@...hat.com, snitzer@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] dm mpath: Interface for explicit probing of active
paths
On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 07:33:50PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote:
> I still don't get what this buys us.
You get one layer to deal with instead of polking into a leak
abstraction. Qemu sees a block devices, checks if it supports
persistent reservations and everything is taken care underneath
instead of having to try to understand what is below and working around
it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists