[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <untqxy76skl53c55bdjz5usk4seuypjqbxkfub2qeqz42mewqr@r4cutmkvy235>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 14:49:31 +0100
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, bvanassche@....org,
andersson@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com,
konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com, quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com, quic_cang@...cinc.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 07/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_exit() and
Inline qmp_ufs_com_exit()
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 09:57:18PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
> qmp_ufs_exit() is a wrapper function. It only calls qmp_ufs_com_exit().
> Remove it to simplify the ufs phy driver.
>
Okay, so you are doing it now...
> Additonally partial Inline(dropping the reset assert) qmp_ufs_com_exit
> into qmp_ufs_power_off function to avoid unnecessary function call.
>
Why are you dropping the reset_assert()?
> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 19 +++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> index a5974a1fb5bb..fca47e5e8bf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
> @@ -1758,19 +1758,6 @@ static void qmp_ufs_init_registers(struct qmp_ufs *qmp, const struct qmp_phy_cfg
> qmp_ufs_init_all(qmp, &cfg->tbls_hs_b);
> }
>
> -static int qmp_ufs_com_exit(struct qmp_ufs *qmp)
> -{
> - const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg;
> -
> - reset_control_assert(qmp->ufs_reset);
> -
> - clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(qmp->num_clks, qmp->clks);
> -
> - regulator_bulk_disable(cfg->num_vregs, qmp->vregs);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy)
> {
> struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> @@ -1851,7 +1838,11 @@ static int qmp_ufs_power_off(struct phy *phy)
> qphy_clrbits(qmp->pcs, cfg->regs[QPHY_PCS_POWER_DOWN_CONTROL],
> SW_PWRDN);
>
> - qmp_ufs_com_exit(qmp);
> + /* Turn off all the phy clocks */
You should drop this and below comment. They add no value.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists