[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e237878-bc8c-4c88-ad9d-469ce4389274@collabora.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 15:58:21 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Hao Chang <ot_chhao.chang@...iatek.com>,
Qingliang Li <qingliang.li@...iatek.com>
Cc: kernel@...labora.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: mediatek: eint: Fix invalid pointer
dereference for v1 platforms
Il 21/05/25 15:53, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
> Il 20/05/25 23:15, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
>> Commit 3ef9f710efcb ("pinctrl: mediatek: Add EINT support for multiple
>> addresses") introduced an access to the 'soc' field of struct
>> mtk_pinctrl in mtk_eint_do_init() and for that an include of
>> pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h.
>>
>> However, pinctrl drivers relying on the v1 common driver include
>> pinctrl-mtk-common.h instead, which provides another definition of
>> struct mtk_pinctrl that does not contain an 'soc' field.
>>
>> Since mtk_eint_do_init() can be called both by v1 and v2 drivers, it
>> will now try to dereference an invalid pointer when called on v1
>> platforms. This has been observed on Genio 350 EVK (MT8365), which
>> crashes very early in boot (the kernel trace can only be seen with
>> earlycon).
>>
>> In order to fix this, since 'struct mtk_pinctrl' was only needed to get
>> a 'struct mtk_eint_pin', make 'struct mtk_eint_pin' a parameter
>> of mtk_eint_do_init() so that callers need to supply it, removing
>> mtk_eint_do_init()'s dependency on any particular 'struct mtk_pinctrl'.
>>
>> Fixes: 3ef9f710efcb ("pinctrl: mediatek: Add EINT support for multiple addresses")
>> Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Completely changed approach to make mtk_eint_pin a parameter of
>> mtk_eint_do_init() as suggested by Angelo
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250519-genio-350-eint-null-ptr-deref-
>> fix-v1-1-07445d6d22c3@...labora.com
>> ---
>> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c | 26 ++++++++++--------------
>> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.h | 5 +++--
>> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mtk-common.c | 2 +-
>> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-
>> eint.c
>> index
>> 16af6a47028e67bb53db4041a37ebbbb8b9a1e43..d906a5e4101fb10968035fc48e9cf4a444d063a9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/mtk-eint.c
>> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include "mtk-eint.h"
>> -#include "pinctrl-mtk-common-v2.h"
>> #define MTK_EINT_EDGE_SENSITIVE 0
>> #define MTK_EINT_LEVEL_SENSITIVE 1
>> @@ -505,10 +504,9 @@ int mtk_eint_find_irq(struct mtk_eint *eint, unsigned long
>> eint_n)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtk_eint_find_irq);
>> -int mtk_eint_do_init(struct mtk_eint *eint)
>> +int mtk_eint_do_init(struct mtk_eint *eint, struct mtk_eint_pin *eint_pin)
>> {
>> unsigned int size, i, port, virq, inst = 0;
>> - struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = (struct mtk_pinctrl *)eint->pctl;
>> /* If clients don't assign a specific regs, let's use generic one */
>> if (!eint->regs)
>> @@ -519,7 +517,15 @@ int mtk_eint_do_init(struct mtk_eint *eint)
>> if (!eint->base_pin_num)
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> - if (eint->nbase == 1) {
>
> Okay, dropping the nbase == 1 is sane, but that statement was actually documenting
> the fact that *eint_pin is used only for multi-base EINT case, so please add those
> comments:
>
>> + if (eint_pin) {
>
> /* EINT with multiple bases */
>
>> + eint->pins = eint_pin;
>> + for (i = 0; i < eint->hw->ap_num; i++) {
>> + inst = eint->pins[i].instance;
>> + if (inst >= eint->nbase)
>> + continue;
>> + eint->base_pin_num[inst]++;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>
> /* Single base EINT */
>
> ...after which:
>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>
> Thanks for fixing this!
>
Just acknowledged that Linus already picked this one.
It's fine either way, no worries.
Cheers,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists