[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<BN7PR02MB4148503E1599C1310F408863D49EA@BN7PR02MB4148.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 14:44:04 +0000
From: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Sean Christopherson
<seanjc@...gle.com>, Nuno Das Neves <nunodasneves@...ux.microsoft.com>
CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri
Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev"
<kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>, David
Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Stefano
Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, Oleksandr Tyshchenko
<oleksandr_tyshchenko@...m.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 08/12] sched/wait: Drop WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from
add_wait_queue_priority()
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2025 4:43 AM
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 03:20:00PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2025, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 11:55:10AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > Drop the setting of WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from add_wait_queue_priority() to
> > > > differentiate it from add_wait_queue_priority_exclusive(). The one and
> > > > only user add_wait_queue_priority(), Xen privcmd's irqfd_wakeup(),
> > > > unconditionally returns '0', i.e. doesn't actually operate in exclusive
> > > > mode.
> > >
> > > I find:
> > >
> > > drivers/hv/mshv_eventfd.c: add_wait_queue_priority(wqh, &irqfd->irqfd_wait);
> > > drivers/xen/privcmd.c: add_wait_queue_priority(wqh, &kirqfd->wait);
> > >
> > > I mean, it might still be true and all, but hyperv seems to also use
> > > this now.
> >
> > Oh FFS, another "heavily inspired by KVM". I should have bribed someone to take
> > this series when I had the chance. *sigh*
> >
> > Unfortunately, the Hyper-V code does actually operate in exclusive mode. Unless
> > you have a better idea, I'll tweak the series to:
> >
> > 1. Drop WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from add_wait_queue_priority() and have the callers
> > explicitly set the flag,
> > 2. Add a patch to drop WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from Xen privcmd entirely.
> > 3. Introduce add_wait_queue_priority_exclusive() and switch KVM to use it.
> >
> > That has an added bonus of introducing the Xen change in a dedicated patch, i.e.
> > is probably a sequence anyways.
> >
> > Alternatively, I could rewrite the Hyper-V code a la the KVM changes, but I'm not
> > feeling very charitable at the moment (the complete lack of documentation for
> > their ioctl doesn't help).
>
> Works for me. Michael is typically very responsive wrt hyperv (but you
> probably know this).
I can't be much help on this issue. This Hyper-V code is for Linux running in
the root partition (i.e., "dom0") and I don't have a setup where I can run and
test that configuration.
Adding Nuno Das Neves from Microsoft for his thoughts.
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists