[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <119c9a70-6ea8-46f0-b877-8a433d97ce84@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 16:58:42 +0100
From: James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 4/4] perf: arm_pmuv3: Add support for the Branch
Record Buffer Extension (BRBE)
On 19/05/2025 10:56 pm, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:06:22PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hey Rob,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 12:41:33PM -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>>> From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>>>
>>> The ARMv9.2 architecture introduces the optional Branch Record Buffer
>>> Extension (BRBE), which records information about branches as they are
>>> executed into set of branch record registers. BRBE is similar to x86's
>>> Last Branch Record (LBR) and PowerPC's Branch History Rolling Buffer
>>> (BHRB).
>>
>> Since you picked this up from v19, the driver has changed considerably
>> and I presume you will be continuing to extend it in future as the
>> architecture progresses. Perhaps having you listed as Author (and
>> crucially, in git blame :p) with Anshuman as a Co-developed-by: would be
>> more appropriate?
>
> Shrug.
>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/perf/Kconfig | 11 +
>>> drivers/perf/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/perf/arm_brbe.c | 802 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> drivers/perf/arm_brbe.h | 47 +++
>>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 15 +-
>>> drivers/perf/arm_pmuv3.c | 129 ++++++-
>>> include/linux/perf/arm_pmu.h | 8 +
>>> 7 files changed, 1006 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> Do you know if James Clark's tests [1] are going to be respun for the
>> perf tool? It would be handy to have some way to test this new
>> functionality.
>
> Yes. I dropped them here because I've been told by Arnaldo in the past
> to send userspace stuff separately.
>
That version of the test was out of date so I've pushed the new version
here:
https://git.linaro.org/plugins/gitiles/people/james.clark/linux.git/+/16e4a18c2d5fc53736f05c9052b1d11d74909707
But I'll wait for the driver changes to be finalised before posting it.
Or Rob can take it back into the patchset.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists