[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aC4aNCpZMoYJ7R02@strlen.de>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 20:23:48 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>, kadlec@...filter.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Zi Li <zi.li@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] netfilter: load nf_log_syslog on enabling
nf_conntrack_log_invalid
Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev> wrote:
> > There is no need for 'syslog' to be active for 'log_invalid' to be
> > useful as long as the system in question has e.g. ulogd running
> > and listening to nflog messages.
> >
> > If anything, the modprobe should be done only when no logger
> > is registered.
>
> Yes, could we load the module only when no logger exists? Something
> like:
>
> + if (nf_logger_find_get(NFPROTO_IPV4, NF_LOG_TYPE_LOG) != 0)
> + request_module("%s", "nf_log_syslog");
This function bumps the module refcount, so if the logger exists you
would need to call nf_logger_put() too.
I'd add a new, simpler helper, that only returns if any logger
is active.
bool nf_log_is_registered(int pf);
or something like that.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists