[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a7ffc24-dba0-4b67-9d3d-477f3bdf2128@prolan.hu>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 09:01:14 +0200
From: Csókás Bence <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
To: <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>, "Vinod
Koul" <vkoul@...nel.org>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] dma-engine: sun4i: Simplify error handling in probe()
Hi,
On 2025. 05. 14. 18:18, Bence Csókás wrote:
> Clean up error handling by using devm functions and dev_err_probe(). This
> should make it easier to add new code, as we can eliminate the "goto
> ladder" in sun4i_dma_probe().
>
> Suggested-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
> Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>
> ---
So, can this be merged? I do believe we have ACKs from most maintainers.
Bence
Powered by blists - more mailing lists