[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <434ab5d7-313c-4835-b0d9-47a1eec31551@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 09:25:59 +0200
From: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio_ring: Fix error reporting in virtqueue_resize
On 21/05/2025 03:00, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 7:05 PM Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> The virtqueue_resize() function was not correctly propagating error codes
>> from its internal resize helper functions, specifically
>> virtqueue_resize_packet() and virtqueue_resize_split(). If these helpers
>> returned an error, but the subsequent call to virtqueue_enable_after_reset()
>> succeeded, the original error from the resize operation would be masked.
>> Consequently, virtqueue_resize() could incorrectly report success to its
>> caller despite an underlying resize failure.
>>
>> This change restores the original code behavior:
>>
>> if (vdev->config->enable_vq_after_reset(_vq))
>> return -EBUSY;
>>
>> return err;
>>
>> Fix: commit ad48d53b5b3f ("virtio_ring: separate the logic of reset/enable from virtqueue_resize")
>> Cc: xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> index b784aab66867..4397392bfef0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
>> @@ -2797,7 +2797,7 @@ int virtqueue_resize(struct virtqueue *_vq, u32 num,
>> void (*recycle_done)(struct virtqueue *vq))
>> {
>> struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
>> - int err;
>> + int err, err_reset;
>>
>> if (num > vq->vq.num_max)
>> return -E2BIG;
>> @@ -2819,7 +2819,11 @@ int virtqueue_resize(struct virtqueue *_vq, u32 num,
>> else
>> err = virtqueue_resize_split(_vq, num);
>>
>> - return virtqueue_enable_after_reset(_vq);
>> + err_reset = virtqueue_enable_after_reset(_vq);
>
> I wonder if we should call virtqueue_enable_after_reset() when
> virtqueue_resize_xxx() fail.
Original code modified by ad48d53b5b3f did the reset. And the commit removes it without
explanation.
And as we did a virtqueue_disable_and_recycle(), I think we need the
virtqueue_enable_after_reset() to restart the queue.
In virtnet_tx_resize(), we have virtnet_tx_resume() unconditionnaly, even in case of error
of virtqueue_resize(). virtnet_tx_resize() is called by virtnet_set_ringparam(), that is
the function called by 'ethtool -G' and I think a failure of ethtool should not break the
virtqueue.
Thanks,
Laurent
>
> Thanks
>
>> + if (err_reset)
>> + return err_reset;
>> +
>> + return err;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_resize);
>>
>> --
>> 2.49.0
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists