lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aC2TdzP1AwYrQdcW@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 10:48:55 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	bhe@...hat.com, chrisl@...nel.org, graf@...zon.com,
	jasonmiu@...gle.com, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	pasha.tatashin@...een.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memblock: show a warning if allocation in KHO
 scratch fails

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 10:43:15AM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> I think we should just make sparse_init_nid() panic or at least change 
> "sparse_init_nid: node[0] memory map backing failed. Some memory will not be available."
> to something more visible and clear. 

Panicking the system seems a bit too harsh.
Those sections will not be initialized, and sure you will lose some memory,
but still.

I think that making sure that subsection_map_init() does not access
non-initialized values is enough.
Because wrt. error message, I am not sure it can get more clear that we
failed we allocate memory to back the section and so that section will
not be activated :-)

 

-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ