linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] Introduce CET supervisor state support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aC0c4U6tsVif+M4H@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 08:22:57 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	<seanjc@...gle.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
	<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
	<john.allen@....com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
	<xin3.li@...el.com>, Aruna Ramakrishna <aruna.ramakrishna@...cle.com>, "Dave
 Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Kees Cook
	<kees@...nel.org>, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, Mitchell Levy
	<levymitchell0@...il.com>, Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>, "Oleg
 Nesterov" <oleg@...hat.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
	"Sohil Mehta" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>, Stanislav Spassov
	<stanspas@...zon.de>, "Uros Bizjak" <ubizjak@...il.com>, Vignesh
 Balasubramanian <vigbalas@....com>, "Zhao Liu" <zhao1.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/6] Introduce CET supervisor state support

On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 08:20:54AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>On 5/15/25 08:41, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com> wrote:
>>> I kindly request your consideration for merging this series. Most of 
>>> patches have received Reviewed-by/Acked-by tags.
>> I don't see anything objectionable in this series.
>> 
>> The upcoming v6.16 merge window is already quite crowded in terms of 
>> FPU changes, so I think at this point we are looking at a v6.17 merge, 
>> done shortly after v6.16-rc1 if everything goes well. Dave, what do you 
>> think?
>
>It's getting into shape, but it has a slight shortage of reviews. For
>now, it's an all-Intel patch even though I _thought_ AMD had this
>feature too. It's also purely for KVM and has some suggested-by's from
>Sean, but no KVM acks on it.
>
>Sean is not exactly the quiet type about things, but it always warms me
>heart to see an acked-by accompanying a suggested-by because it
>indicates that the suggestion was heard and implemented properly.

Hi Sean, John,

Based on Dave's feedback, could you please review this series and provide your
reviewed-by/acked-by if appropriate?