[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1sekylp3g.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 21:39:20 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: "ping.gao" <ping.gao@...sung.com>
Cc: alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
peter.wang@...iatek.com, minwoo.im@...sung.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, chenyuan0y@...il.com,
cw9316.lee@...sung.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: mcq: delete ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd in
ufshcd_mcq_abort
> after ufs UFS_ABORT_TASK process successfully , host will generate
> mcq irq for abort tag with response OCS_ABORTED
> ufshcd_compl_one_cqe ->
> ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd
>
> But in ufshcd_mcq_abort already do ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd, this means
> __ufshcd_release will be done twice.
>
> This means hba->clk_gating.active_reqs also will be decrease twice, it
> will be negtive, so delete ufshcd_release_scsi_cmd in ufshcd_mcq_abort
> function.
Applied to 6.16/scsi-staging, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists