linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 00/11] Refactor ufs phy powerup sequence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <yq1msb6lowo.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 21:45:40 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
        James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        bvanassche@....org, andersson@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
        dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com, konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com,
        quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com, quic_cang@...cinc.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/11] Refactor ufs phy powerup sequence


Hi Nitin!

> Nitin Rawat (11):
>   scsi: ufs: qcom: add a new phy calibrate API call
>   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_enable and qmp_ufs_power_on
>   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks
>   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor UFS PHY reset
>   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_com_init()
>   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_power_off
>   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_exit() and Inline qmp_ufs_com_exit()
>   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: refactor qmp_ufs_power_off
>   scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls
>   scsi: ufs: qcom : Introduce phy_power_on/off wrapper function
>   scsi: ufs: qcom: Prevent calling phy_exit before phy_init

What is your intent wrt. getting this series merged? Can the phy: and
scsi: patches be merged independently?

-- 
Martin K. Petersen