[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aC0fOC8IiQJShYOe@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 08:32:56 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Sean
Christopherson" <seanjc@...gle.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
<x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Paolo
Bonzini" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] x86: nVMX: check vmcs12->guest_ia32_debugctl
value given by L2
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 05:48:44PM -0400, mlevitsk@...hat.com wrote:
>On Fri, 2025-05-16 at 10:50 -0400, mlevitsk@...hat.com wrote:
>> On Fri, 2025-05-16 at 11:31 +0800, Chao Gao wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 08:53:52PM -0400, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>> > > Check the vmcs12 guest_ia32_debugctl value before loading it, to avoid L2
>> > > being able to load arbitrary values to hardware IA32_DEBUGCTL.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
>> > > ---
>> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 4 ++++
>> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
>> > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 2 ++
>> > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
>> > > index e073e3008b16..0bda6400e30a 100644
>> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
>> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
>> > > @@ -3193,6 +3193,10 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> > > CC((vmcs12->guest_bndcfgs & MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS_RSVD))))
>> > > return -EINVAL;
>> > >
>> > > + if ((vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_DEBUG_CONTROLS) &&
>> > > + CC(vmcs12->guest_ia32_debugctl & ~vmx_get_supported_debugctl(vcpu, false)))
>> > > + return -EINVAL;
>> > > +
>> >
>> > How about grouping this check with the one against DR7 a few lines above?
>>
>> Good idea, will do.
>
>Besides the above change, is there anything else to change in this patchset?
>If not I'll sent a new version soon.
...
>> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>> > > index 6d1e40ecc024..1b80479505d3 100644
>> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
>> > > @@ -413,7 +413,9 @@ static inline void vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr,
>> > > vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, msr, type);
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > +
>> >
>> > stray newline.
Can you remove this newline? (not sure if you've already noticed this)
Also, the shortlogs for patches 3-4 don't follow the convention. They should be
"KVM: nVMX" and "KVM: VMX". With these fixed,
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists