linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 00/11] Refactor ufs phy powerup sequence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ni7kedpcz7vchztb5qrs5msdt37mfdoabtt4gdqsaiwmbxlb2a@im4wurr77z43>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 16:10:41 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>, vkoul@...nel.org,
        kishon@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
        James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, bvanassche@....org,
        andersson@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org,
        konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com, quic_rdwivedi@...cinc.com,
        quic_cang@...cinc.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/11] Refactor ufs phy powerup sequence

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 09:45:40PM -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> 
> Hi Nitin!
> 
> > Nitin Rawat (11):
> >   scsi: ufs: qcom: add a new phy calibrate API call
> >   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_enable and qmp_ufs_power_on
> >   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks
> >   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor UFS PHY reset
> >   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_com_init()
> >   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_power_off
> >   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_exit() and Inline qmp_ufs_com_exit()
> >   phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: refactor qmp_ufs_power_off
> >   scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls
> >   scsi: ufs: qcom : Introduce phy_power_on/off wrapper function
> >   scsi: ufs: qcom: Prevent calling phy_exit before phy_init
> 
> What is your intent wrt. getting this series merged? Can the phy: and
> scsi: patches be merged independently?

Unfortunately PHY patches depend on the first scsi patch.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry