linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm: Fix rustgcc unknown argument '-mno-fdpic'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <95d28adf-1eae-4d33-9421-c0864933c242@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 08:14:46 -0700
From: Rudraksha Gupta <guptarud@...il.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
 Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
 Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
 Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>,
 Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>,
 Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
 Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
 Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
 rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 llvm@...ts.linux.dev, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
 Ben Wolsieffer <ben.wolsieffer@...ring.com>,
 Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
 Christian Schrrefl <chrisi.schrefl@...il.com>,
 Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
 anders.roxell@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
 laura.nao@...labora.com, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
 regressions@...ts.linux.dev, Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>,
 Richard Earnshaw <richard.earnshaw@....com>,
 Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramanara@...dia.com>,
 Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm: Fix rustgcc unknown argument '-mno-fdpic'

> No worries, I will apply this one :)
>
> I will remove the tag, unless you want it there for some reason (e.g.
> because you want to point out some extra testing that goes beyond what
> would normally be done).
>
> Thanks!

Removing the tag is fine by me :)


Rudraksha

>
> Cheers,
> Miguel