[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62cef618-123c-4ffa-b45a-c38b65d2a5a3@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 18:11:13 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, gourry@...rry.net,
hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, raghavendra.kt@....com, riel@...riel.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, sj@...nel.org, weixugc@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, ziy@...dia.com, dave@...olabs.net,
nifan.cxl@...il.com, joshua.hahnjy@...il.com, xuezhengchu@...wei.com,
yiannis@...corp.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0 2/2] mm: sched: Batch-migrate misplaced pages
On 21.05.25 10:02, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Currently the folios identified as misplaced by the NUMA
> balancing sub-system are migrated one by one from the NUMA
> hint fault handler as and when they are identified as
> misplaced.
>
> Instead of such singe folio migrations, batch them and
> migrate them at once.
>
> Identified misplaced folios are isolated and stored in
> a per-task list. A new task_work is queued from task tick
> handler to migrate them in batches. Migration is done
> periodically or if pending number of isolated foios exceeds
> a threshold.
That means that these pages are effectively unmovable for other purposes
(CMA, compaction, long-term pinning, whatever) until that list was drained.
Bad.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists