lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aC8-mUinxA6y688X@pilgrim>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 17:11:21 +0200
From: Remi Pommarel <repk@...plefau.lt>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Cc: Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@...nel.org>,
 Miaoqing Pan <quic_miaoqing@...cinc.com>,
 Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>, Clayton Craft <clayton@...ftyguy.net>,
 Jens Glathe <jens.glathe@...schoolsolutions.biz>,
 Nicolas Escande <nico.escande@...il.com>,
 ath12k@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath12k: fix ring-buffer corruption

Hi Johan,

On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 10:52:19AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Users of the Lenovo ThinkPad X13s have reported that Wi-Fi sometimes
> breaks and the log fills up with errors like:
> 
>     ath11k_pci 0006:01:00.0: HTC Rx: insufficient length, got 1484, expected 1492
>     ath11k_pci 0006:01:00.0: HTC Rx: insufficient length, got 1460, expected 1484
> 
> which based on a quick look at the ath11k driver seemed to indicate some
> kind of ring-buffer corruption.
> 
> Miaoqing Pan tracked it down to the host seeing the updated destination
> ring head pointer before the updated descriptor, and the error handling
> for that in turn leaves the ring buffer in an inconsistent state.
> 
> While this has not yet been observed with ath12k, the ring-buffer
> implementation is very similar to the ath11k one and it suffers from the
> same bugs.

Thanks for the fix. We have actually seen reports that could be related
to this issue with ath12k. I know that this series has already been
applied yet I do have a couple of question on how you fixed that if you
don't mind. That would be much appreciated and would help me understand
if mentionned reports are actually linked to this.

> 
> Add the missing memory barrier to make sure that the descriptor is read
> after the head pointer to address the root cause of the corruption while
> fixing up the error handling in case there are ever any (ordering) bugs
> on the device side.

Just as a personal note, driver doing that kind of ring buffer
communication seems to generally use MMIO to store the ring indices,
readl() providing sufficient synchronization mechanism to avoid that
kind of issue.

> 
> Note that the READ_ONCE() are only needed to avoid compiler mischief in
> case the ring-buffer helpers are ever inlined.
> 
> Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 WLAN.HMT.1.0.c5-00481-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
> 
> Fixes: d889913205cf ("wifi: ath12k: driver for Qualcomm Wi-Fi 7 devices")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org	# 6.3
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218623
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250310010217.3845141-3-quic_miaoqing@quicinc.com
> Cc: Miaoqing Pan <quic_miaoqing@...cinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/ce.c  | 11 +++++------
>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hal.c |  4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/ce.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/ce.c
> index be0d669d31fc..740586fe49d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/ce.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/ce.c
> @@ -343,11 +343,10 @@ static int ath12k_ce_completed_recv_next(struct ath12k_ce_pipe *pipe,
>  		goto err;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Make sure descriptor is read after the head pointer. */
> +	dma_rmb();
> +

That does not seem to be the only place descriptor is read just after
the head pointer, ath12k_dp_rx_process{,err,reo_status,wbm_err} seem to
also suffer the same sickness.

Why not move the dma_rmb() in ath12k_hal_srng_access_begin() as below,
that would look to me as a good place to do it.

@@ -2133,6 +2133,9 @@ void ath12k_hal_srng_access_begin(struct
ath12k_base *ab, struct hal_srng *srng)
                        *(volatile u32 *)srng->u.src_ring.tp_addr;
        else
                srng->u.dst_ring.cached_hp = *srng->u.dst_ring.hp_addr;
+
+       /* Make sure descriptors are read after the head pointer. */
+       dma_rmb();
 }

 /* Update cached ring head/tail pointers to HW.
 * ath12k_hal_srng_access_begin()

This should ensure the issue does not happen anywhere not just for
ath12k_ce_recv_process_cb().

Note that ath12k_hal_srng_dst_get_next_entry() does not need a barrier
as it uses cached_hp from ath12k_hal_srng_access_begin().

>  	*nbytes = ath12k_hal_ce_dst_status_get_length(desc);
> -	if (*nbytes == 0) {
> -		ret = -EIO;
> -		goto err;
> -	}
>  
>  	*skb = pipe->dest_ring->skb[sw_index];
>  	pipe->dest_ring->skb[sw_index] = NULL;
> @@ -380,8 +379,8 @@ static void ath12k_ce_recv_process_cb(struct ath12k_ce_pipe *pipe)
>  		dma_unmap_single(ab->dev, ATH12K_SKB_RXCB(skb)->paddr,
>  				 max_nbytes, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>  
> -		if (unlikely(max_nbytes < nbytes)) {
> -			ath12k_warn(ab, "rxed more than expected (nbytes %d, max %d)",
> +		if (unlikely(max_nbytes < nbytes || nbytes == 0)) {
> +			ath12k_warn(ab, "unexpected rx length (nbytes %d, max %d)",
>  				    nbytes, max_nbytes);
>  			dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
>  			continue;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hal.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hal.c
> index cd59ff8e6c7b..91d5126ca149 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hal.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/hal.c
> @@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ u32 ath12k_hal_ce_dst_status_get_length(struct hal_ce_srng_dst_status_desc *desc
>  {
>  	u32 len;
>  
> -	len = le32_get_bits(desc->flags, HAL_CE_DST_STATUS_DESC_FLAGS_LEN);
> +	len = le32_get_bits(READ_ONCE(desc->flags), HAL_CE_DST_STATUS_DESC_FLAGS_LEN);
>  	desc->flags &= ~cpu_to_le32(HAL_CE_DST_STATUS_DESC_FLAGS_LEN);
>  
>  	return len;
> @@ -2132,7 +2132,7 @@ void ath12k_hal_srng_access_begin(struct ath12k_base *ab, struct hal_srng *srng)
>  		srng->u.src_ring.cached_tp =
>  			*(volatile u32 *)srng->u.src_ring.tp_addr;
>  	else
> -		srng->u.dst_ring.cached_hp = *srng->u.dst_ring.hp_addr;
> +		srng->u.dst_ring.cached_hp = READ_ONCE(*srng->u.dst_ring.hp_addr);

dma_rmb() acting also as a compiler barrier why the need for both
READ_ONCE() ?

>  }
>  
>  /* Update cached ring head/tail pointers to HW. ath12k_hal_srng_access_begin()
> -- 
> 2.48.1

Regards,

-- 
Remi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ