[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aC9vJiiOi1E7PesF@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 14:38:30 -0400
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Aman Kumar Pandey <aman.kumarpandey@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org>,
"alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Vikash Bansal <vikash.bansal@....com>,
Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@....com>,
Shashank Rebbapragada <shashank.rebbapragada@....com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: i3c: Add NXP P3H2x4x
i3c-hub support
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:18:46PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/05/2025 13:45, Aman Kumar Pandey wrote:
> >>
> >
> > These are not vender specific properties. all these properties are as per i3c hub specification.
> > What should I change for above properties ?
>
> BTW, if this was I3C spec, then I would also expect all of such
> spec-related-properties to be in shared schema.
At least I have not found it at mipi org. I supposed some vendors choose the
similar design like other's i2c sensor/gpio expander chips.
So I think we can keep this property here until it is prompted to standard.
Frank
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists