[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250522235223.3178519-12-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 16:52:21 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 11/13] KVM: selftests: Assert that eventfd() succeeds in
Xen shinfo test
Assert that eventfd() succeeds in the Xen shinfo test instead of skipping
the associated testcase. While eventfd() is outside the scope of KVM, KVM
unconditionally selects EVENTFD, i.e. the syscall should always succeed.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/xen_shinfo_test.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/xen_shinfo_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/xen_shinfo_test.c
index 287829f850f7..34d180cf4eed 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/xen_shinfo_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/xen_shinfo_test.c
@@ -548,14 +548,11 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
if (do_eventfd_tests) {
irq_fd[0] = eventfd(0, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(irq_fd[0] >= 0, __KVM_SYSCALL_ERROR("eventfd()", irq_fd[0]));
+
irq_fd[1] = eventfd(0, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(irq_fd[1] >= 0, __KVM_SYSCALL_ERROR("eventfd()", irq_fd[1]));
- /* Unexpected, but not a KVM failure */
- if (irq_fd[0] == -1 || irq_fd[1] == -1)
- do_evtchn_tests = do_eventfd_tests = false;
- }
-
- if (do_eventfd_tests) {
irq_routes.info.nr = 2;
irq_routes.entries[0].gsi = 32;
--
2.49.0.1151.ga128411c76-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists