[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DA2JY06Z0DWG.ZE80FEIJQV92@brighamcampbell.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 02:38:40 -0600
From: "Brigham Campbell" <me@...ghamcampbell.com>
To: "Ankit Chauhan" <ankitchauhan2065@...il.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [next] selftests/ptrace: Fix spelling mistake
"multible" -> "multiple"
On Thu May 1, 2025 at 12:03 AM MDT, Ankit Chauhan wrote:
> Fix the spelling error from "multible" to "multiple".
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Chauhan <ankitchauhan2065@...il.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c b/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c
> index a6884f66dc01..2f345d11e4b8 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ptrace/peeksiginfo.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> /*
> * Dump signal from the process-wide queue.
> - * The number of signals is not multible to the buffer size
> + * The number of signals is not multiple to the buffer size
Excellent work! This could probably be clarified further by fixing the
grammar a little bit (i.e. "... is not a multiple of ...", assuming that
is actually what is meant).
> */
> if (check_direct_path(child, 1, 3))
> goto out;
Reviewed-by: Brigham Campbell <me@...ghamcampbell.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists