lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aC8Pls7jidHCOMJq@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 13:50:46 +0200
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: yangge1116@....com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	21cnbao@...il.com, david@...hat.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	muchun.song@...ux.dev, liuzixing@...on.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: fix kernel NULL pointer dereference when
 replacing free hugetlb folios

On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 11:22:17AM +0800, yangge1116@....com wrote:
> From: Ge Yang <yangge1116@....com>
> 
> A kernel crash was observed when replacing free hugetlb folios:
> 
> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000028
> PGD 0 P4D 0
> Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> CPU: 28 UID: 0 PID: 29639 Comm: test_cma.sh Tainted 6.15.0-rc6-zp #41 PREEMPT(voluntary)
> RIP: 0010:alloc_and_dissolve_hugetlb_folio+0x1d/0x1f0
> RSP: 0018:ffffc9000b30fa90 EFLAGS: 00010286
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000342cca RCX: ffffea0043000000
> RDX: ffffc9000b30fb08 RSI: ffffea0043000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
> RBP: ffffc9000b30fb20 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: ffff88886f92eb00 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffea0043000000
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000010c0200 R15: 0000000000000004
> FS:  00007fcda5f14740(0000) GS:ffff8888ec1d8000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> CR2: 0000000000000028 CR3: 0000000391402000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
>  replace_free_hugepage_folios+0xb6/0x100
>  alloc_contig_range_noprof+0x18a/0x590
>  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
>  ? down_read+0x12/0xa0
>  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
>  cma_range_alloc.constprop.0+0x131/0x290
>  __cma_alloc+0xcf/0x2c0
>  cma_alloc_write+0x43/0xb0
>  simple_attr_write_xsigned.constprop.0.isra.0+0xb2/0x110
>  debugfs_attr_write+0x46/0x70
>  full_proxy_write+0x62/0xa0
>  vfs_write+0xf8/0x420
>  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
>  ? filp_flush+0x86/0xa0
>  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
>  ? filp_close+0x1f/0x30
>  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
>  ? do_dup2+0xaf/0x160
>  ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f
>  ksys_write+0x65/0xe0
>  do_syscall_64+0x64/0x170
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
> 
> There is a potential race between __update_and_free_hugetlb_folio()
> and replace_free_hugepage_folios():
> 
> CPU1                              CPU2
> __update_and_free_hugetlb_folio   replace_free_hugepage_folios
>                                     folio_test_hugetlb(folio)
>                                     -- It's still hugetlb folio.
> 
>   __folio_clear_hugetlb(folio)
>   hugetlb_free_folio(folio)
>                                     h = folio_hstate(folio)
>                                     -- Here, h is NULL pointer
> 
> When the above race condition occurs, folio_hstate(folio) returns
> NULL, and subsequent access to this NULL pointer will cause the
> system to crash. To resolve this issue, execute folio_hstate(folio)
> under the protection of the hugetlb_lock lock, ensuring that
> folio_hstate(folio) does not return NULL.
> 
> Fixes: 04f13d241b8b ("mm: replace free hugepage folios after migration")
> Signed-off-by: Ge Yang <yangge1116@....com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>


-- 
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ