[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de532851-aee0-4841-b9d8-c4ffe3f576dc@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 14:09:51 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] drivers/base/node: Remove
register_memory_blocks_under_node() function call from register_one_node
On 22.05.25 11:17, Donet Tom wrote:
> register_one_node() is now only called via cpu_up() → __try_online_node()
> during CPU hotplug operations to online a node.
>
> At this stage, the node has not yet had any memory added. As a result,
> there are no memory blocks to walk or register, so calling
> register_memory_blocks_under_node() is unnecessary.
>
> Therefore, the call to register_memory_blocks_under_node()
> has been removed from register_one_node().
>
> Acked-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Donet Tom <donettom@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> ---
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists