[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85c18336-f029-457c-ad75-ab15e05050ee@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 21:58:41 +0800
From: Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, Lance Yang
<ioworker0@...il.com>, kadlec@...filter.org, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, Zi Li <zi.li@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/1] netfilter: load nf_log_syslog on enabling
nf_conntrack_log_invalid
On 2025/5/22 21:19, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev> wrote:
>> Does this helper look correct?
>
> Yes, but ...
>> /**
>> * nf_log_is_registered - Check if NF_LOG is registered for a protocol
>> * family
>> *
>> * @pf: protocol family (e.g., NFPROTO_IPV4)
>> *
>> * Returns true if NF_LOG is registered, false otherwise.
>> */
>> bool nf_log_is_registered(int pf)
>> {
>> struct nf_logger *logger;
>>
>> logger = nf_logger_find_get(pf, NF_LOG_TYPE_LOG);
>> if (logger) {
>> nf_logger_put(pf, NF_LOG_TYPE_LOG);
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> logger = nf_logger_find_get(pf, NF_LOG_TYPE_ULOG);
>> if (logger) {
>> nf_logger_put(pf, NF_LOG_TYPE_ULOG);
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> return false;
>> }
>
> Why not simply do:
>
> bool nf_log_is_registered(int pf)
> {
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < NF_LOG_TYPE_MAX; i++) {
> if (rcu_access_pointer(loggers[pf][i]))
> return true;
> }
>
> return false;
> }
Yeah, it's simpler and better. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists